Sunday, September 1, 2013

Should Sandy Redevelopment Funds be Used for Luxury Condos?

As Bloomberg departs, two super scandals from his years in office stand out.  The City Time payroll boondoggle where Mark Mazer played him for a chump; and the rebuilding after September 11th.  The former has received some press, (why not put some displaced from Sandy is this nice spot!?
The impressive $1.8 million brick Colonial house was owned by accused CityTime mastermind Mark Mazer.




but the latter remains majorly under-appreciated.  In cogent blogpost, Good Jobs NY goes back and looks at how Federal money's were used to subsidize luxury condos' and "small businesses" such as boutique law firms.  But what really offends is the lack of a comprehensive regional development framework.   This is in part due to the corruption and economic incompetence of the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation as well as the anti-transparency of the NYC Economic Development Corporation.  If NYC aims for a democratic resilience, NY'ers might have to get into a debate like those around the World Trade Organization in the last decade: reform or eliminate? 

Check out the excellent posts for background:
http://clawback.org/2013/08/23/federal-task-force-on-sandy-rebuilding-urges-regional-economic-development-community-development/

Friday, August 23, 2013

Good piece on the CUNY center that will study Jamaica Bay.  There is a conference coming up on this that will be at Brooklyn College in October.  And we will also discuss thus at out Philosophy of the City conference to be held at BC Dec5-7.
http://www.adaptny.org/2013/08/20/jamaica-bay-to-serve-as-lab-for-studying-climate-change/

jamaica-bay-city

Friday, August 16, 2013

GOOD JOBS, AFFORDABLE HOUSING, SUSTAINABLE ENERGY. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION.


These are the four demands articulated in the Alliance for a Just Rebuilding’s report, TURNING THE TIDE; HOW OUR NEXT MAYOR SHOULD TACKLE SANDY REBUILDING.”  (go to www.rebuildajustny.org and click “solutions”)  
I wonder how these demands resonate amidst the economically and racially divided publics of NYC: Mundane and Impossible?  Naive and Necessary?  Under Bloomberg there has been a moderate commitment to sustainable energy both in terms of reduction of energy use and efficiency as well as use of renewables.  The number of affordable housing units, however, has continued to decrease, as housing becomes less affordable in general.  Indeed, last month the NY Times did yet another story on how bad the conditions are in public housing (mold, leaky roofs) and on the repair backlog see this:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/30/nyregion/tenants-sue-new-yorks-housing-authority-over-repair-delays.html?_r=0

and some Mayoral candidates accepted a challenge from housing advocates and slept in tenants apartments (hold all the Weiner jokes, thankfully he’s descended into irrelevancy).  Then the Times did another story on public housing: about the number of people on the waiting lost: 227,000!!!  There are more people on the waiting list than ARE IN PUBLIC HOUSING!  This despite the conditions of the buildings:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/24/nyregion/for-many-seeking-public-housing-the-wait-can-be-endless.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

I wonder how any mayor’s term could be considered successful if such a sizeable section of the city lives in such an precarious and/or untenable situation.  And the 500,000+ we are talking about doesn’t even include all the substandard rental situations, much less the homeless!  

What does it mean to demand “affordable housing”?  Is this merely a plea for more government regulation or movement for a new kind of ownership?  AJR is exploring both.  There has been a lot of work done on the second route, on a different model of ownership.  One type is called ”community land trusts” or CLTs.    Check out a short essay on this by NYC planner Tom Angotti here:


and a longer academic study here:


This is one (crucial) element in the transformation of the existing economy into a solidarity economy or what Gar Alperovitz calls the “pluralist commonwealth.”  More on that in the next post. 

Monday, August 12, 2013

New Top-Tier Research Institute, Conservancy Coming to Jamaica Bay - Rockaway Beach - DNAinfo.com New York

Big news for NYC's pursuit of urban resilience and CUNY!  Not only will there be a research institute run by CUNY, and first housed at Brooklyn College (!), but a Jamaica Bay conservancy has been founded (ala Central Park conservancy) and there is an "ideas competition" being run by the Dept of Interior (Federal) which is a new twist because they other idea competitions are run bu the city (NYC EDC or HPD).  Although maybe HUD Is running one as well now.  In any case, i only found out recently the Bloomberg's vision for Jamaica Bay is not to "develop" it but to make it into a tourist destination/preserve/research site.  More comments to come, but for now, I am very proud of my BC and CUNY colleagues for working over the last two years or so to pull this together--twas amazingly complictadd because of all the organizations and juridisdictions involved, especially state, local and federal, and parks.

New Top-Tier Research Institute, Conservancy Coming to Jamaica Bay - Rockaway Beach - DNAinfo.com New York

Saturday, August 3, 2013

Thursday, August 1, 2013

a great march!

What a great march!.  A couple hundred people showed up at South Ferry--from tenants fighting incredibly unfair rent hikes to day laborers who cleaned up flooded basements in unsafe conditions and were never paid for their work; from homeowners to public housing residents, construction workers to students, environmental artists and democracy advocates all concerned about the future of NYC and its people.  And wondering about all that money coming in!  Just a few of the org's who walked from South ferry to Zucotti park for a teach in to City hall for the press conference: 

350.org, ALIGN, Arts & Democracy, CVH, El Centro del Inmigrante, Faith in NY, Good Jobs NY, Greater NY Labor-Religion Coalition, Hunger Action Network, LiUNA Local 10 and 78, NDLON, NYCC, NYSNA, Occupy Sandy, Participatory Budgeting Project, Physicians for a National Health Program – NY Metro, Red Hook Initiative, SEIU 32BJ, Solidarity NYC, VOCAL, and the Workers Justice Project...



Tuesday, July 30, 2013

THE FUTURE OF NYC IS (NOT) NOW; FROM THE SKYLINE OF FINANCE TO THE SHORELINE OF DEMOCRATIC RESILIENCE

On October 22nd, an elongated area of low pressure emerged in the Western Caribbean begetting storms and churning the seas. By Oct 24 what started as a tropical wave had morphed into a hurricane, crossing Jamaica, battering Haiti, then the Bahamas. 2 days after that Sandy was sucking up the warm waters of the Gulf Stream sending fear up the spines of coastal residents who had been gearing up for Halloween and/or the presidential election. And on oct 29th, this “freak” megastorm made that infamous hard left turn and came ashore in NJ and NY bringing with it record setting storms surges. All in all 286 people were killed in 7 countries.

Superstorm Sandy forever changed the way that NYC thinks about climate change and itself. Well, not exactly. And that’s the confusing part. No retreat = No future? NYC has no future. That’s really the only way to read SIRR report. The future is just an extension of the present, THIS present shaped by the needs of capital intensive growth: finance, tourism, hi tech. The consequences of this model: increasing economic inequality and vulnerability to rising sea levels.

It’s not that the Bloomberg administration denies climate change (their position on economic inequality will be addressed in a subsequent post). Indeed, back in 2007 they released PLAN NYC which created a blueprint for the city to reduce its carbon emissions--“mitigation” in the climate change parlance--and become more sustainable in ten areas: Housing and Neighborhoods; Parks and Public Spaces; Brownfields; Waterways; Water Supply; Transportation; Energy; Air Quality; Solid Waste; and Climate Change. transportation, energy use, water use, housing and public buildings. It’s pretty good. (Again, bracketing for the moment the extraneous issues of inequality, and well, democracy.)

The SIRR plan, however, is about adaptation. Because we didn’t reduce emissions quick enough, we have to adapt because the climate has already changed. When the climate has already changed so much that’s it’s smacking our infrastructure in ways that shock the core of our system, then we don’t just adapt, we gotta be “resilient.” We’ve got to bounce back and upgrade while doing it. So in 6 years we’ve gone from the feel good sustainability of Plan NYC to the urgent reconstruction of “A More Resilient NY” (what will the plan look like in 2018!?) One of the scariest aspects of the plan, the second most disturbing (we discussed the first last post), is that it doesn’t give up an inch of real estate. “We will not retreat from the waterfront.” The mayor has said this over and over. That property is just too valuable. (For whom?) Instead, we (who??) will show the world (again, who: New Orleans? Bangladesh) how to dwell on the coast. How to be resilient as the seas rise. SIRR doesn’t give up an inch. It’s incredible. Couldn’t we make a small donation somewhere in acknowledgement that sea levels are already rising? Some small slice of lower Manhattan, an island in Jamaica bay? Maybe a dune in Coney Island?

What about the ecological virtue of humility: giving way, making space and acknowledging the power and interests of nonhuman others? No. Instead we will build back even better. Build what? Luxury condo’s with Duane’s Reade’s on the bottom floor but 6 feet higher to accommodate the surf? Look at the details of the plan--there are lots of details. Indeed, Bloomberg is so committed to the reclaiming of the waterfront that union pension funds have been tapped to help Related and Co. build--what exactly we don’t know--in Zone A. (A deal brokered by John Liu BTW, see my post from March 19th, 2013) And for all those homeowners who want to stay in Zone A (I know it’s been renamed, more on that later) but can’t afford the new insurance premiums the city will use public funds to help them stay! (see the SIRR report.)

From the Skyline to the Shoreline 
For many NYC is and has been defined by its skyline. Can we imagine NYC without finance capital pouring into the waterfront? What would NYC politics look like with the real estate sector dominating it? Bloomberg says “No retreat” because the SIRR can’t break the spell of finance capital and real estate: SIRR literally can’t see the future so there is none, there’s only the present. And what is “present” is the configuration of forces that made the skyline. But the future of NYC is tied to a different line. It’s called the SHORE line. And it’s receding, that is, sinking into the past. As the tide changes, what politics will emerge? That’s what wednesday’s march is all about: articulating the topography of democratic resilience.

Monday, July 29, 2013

TURNING THE TIDE: NYC's PLAN FOR SANDY AND WE MARCH!

Protecting subway tunnels from future floods, installing backup power generators for senior centers so they can run air conditioners and medical equipment during a blackout, building new dunes to absorb bigger waves from higher seas.  These are just some of the proposals scattered across 400 plus pages of “A Stronger More Resilient New York.”  The attention to detail is tremendous, both in terms of the technologies involved and geographically.  There are separate sections on sectors such as insurance, utilities and transportation as well as on the different coastal areas of NYC: South Queens, South Brooklyn.  Geographically what is missing is the South Bronx.  True, it did not get hit like the Brooklyn and Queens Waterfronts and Staten Island and Lower Manhattan (all these locales get separate sections), but it houses what is arguably the most important piece of coastal infrastructure in all of NYC: Hunts Point Terminal Market.  That’s where most of our food enters the city.  If it is knocked out, there’s only about 2-3 days of food in the city at any given time.  


The other element that is missing is, well, people.  Yes, there is some great demographics in the report on race and income, and age and ethnicity.  But there isn’t much about communities, or community organizations, or resident associations, or religious operations.  The focus is city agencies and technical infrastrastructure: on sea walls and docks, sewage treatment plants and power lines, on the Departments of Transportation (DOT) and Housing Preservation and Development (HPD).   LOTS of acronyms.  The two most frequently cited agency acronym are the US Army Corp of Engineers (USACE) and the NYC Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC).  We shall have more to say about them in a couple days.  But the point for now, our first point, is that what is missing are the people in their myriad social forums and associative formations.  CITES?   As NYC Environmental Justice Alliance put it at their regional meeting shortly after Sandy’s devastation, “communities themselves were the first responders.”  (Check out their report here:

This is a point both obvious and counter-intuitive.  The goal is for a “stronger more resilient New York.”  Yes.  But what is being protected and what is being made resilient?  It’s one thing to make a subway tunnel resilient, it’s another thing to the people who ride the trains resilient.  When Sandy hit, and in the chaos afterwards, in many neighborhoods it was community leaders, from organizations or resident associations, who were the first responders.  (for more on this , read the VillageVoice’s Nick Pinto’s excellent “Hurricane Sandy is New York’s Katrina”  http://www.villagevoice.com/2012-11-21/news/hurricane-sandy-is-new-york-s-katrina/
and the Alliance for Just Rebuilding’s report. )  The SIRR report doesnt really take this seriously.  And that is an undoubtedly deadly omission.  

The best way to make NYC resilient is to support the organizations who work directly with the peoples of NYC on the ground, in the neighborhoods.  They know the needs and capabilities of the people there, and they know the “there” because its theirs.  They know the literal landscapes.  

SIRR fails to fund the “infrastructure” that is most critical for people’s well being: the social infrastructure, the community organizations and associations, the networks of residents who knew who needed help, who knew what people were trapped, who needed medications, who hadn’t been feed or needed help getting out and so on.  In many situations they instructed official first responders and told the Red Cross and others were to go.   This was perhaps most evident in the Rockaways with Occupy Sandy and others, but also the case in Staten Island and the Lower East Side during its extended blackout.   

This theme is a big part of what Wednesday’s MARCH is about: “TURNING THE TIDE”: 10:45 am SI Ferry Terminal at Whitehall, Lower Manhattan.  We will march uptown to the NYC EDC and then City Hall.  more at
www.rebuildajustny.org


Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Bloomberg's Plan

On June 11th, NYC released its plan for reconstructing the city in response to climate change in general and Superstorm’s Sandy (and Irene too) in particular. (and let’s not forget that snowy Noreaster the weak after Sandy!) The plan is called the Special Initiative for Resilience asnd Reconstruction (SIRR). http://www.nyc.gov/html/sirr/html/home/home.shtml It will cost 19.5 billion (about 10 billion of that is allocated, 5 billion is around, needs another 4 billion). Over the next couple days I will be posting re: the following: 1) what does the plan cover? Why does it not include the most critical piece of NYC infrastructure in Zone A (hint: where most of our food comes in)? 2) what two agencies are the key players in the implementation? (hint: one is city, and not a public agency; the other is federal and just had its budget cut) 3) what sort of model of economic development does the plan utilize to (re)develop so many vulnerable NYC neighborhoods? (hint: you've seen it before and it failed.) 4) is there an existing model of economic development that can promote a sustainable resilient NYC metropolitan region in a way that is equitable, inclusive and genuinely democratic? (hint: you betcha!) MORE TO COME AND SEE YOU JULY 31st at South Ferry station 10:30am!

Wednesday, June 5, 2013

NYSE Roundtable: Officials Talk Lessons Learned from Sandy | PropertyCasualty360

NYSE Roundtable: Officials Talk Lessons Learned from Sandy | PropertyCasualty360

Two Pivotal Elections: What The 1977 Mayoral Race Can Tell Us About 2013 | Elections

 “You go to the boroughs outside Manhattan and you hear about an unresponsive government that took care of the affluent on Wall Street and did not help them,” Sherrill said. “I think a candidate who makes an appeal to frustrated working-class people that he or she will stand up for against the relatively well off who saw a much more rapid recovery can do very well in the parts of the city that were devastated and haven’t bounced back. With the rising inequality, there is a strong sense that no one is looking out for ‘people like me.’ I would not be surprised to hear Anthony Weiner take that up. I would not be surprised if the election turned on personality and style more than the issues. I think an angry candidate can do very well, I’m afraid.”

Two Pivotal Elections: What The 1977 Mayoral Race Can Tell Us About 2013 | Elections

CUNY Law Community Economic Development Clinic Partners with Mondragon Corporation on Union Coops – CUNY School of Law

This is big news.  Some of these folks will be at the LAWCHA conference that starts tomorrow at the Center for Worker Education. 

CUNY Law Community Economic Development Clinic Partners with Mondragon Corporation on Union Coops – CUNY School of Law

Done Right, Eliminating Food Deserts Result in Community Oases -- Rooflines

Nice short piece on communty economic development and food system: example from Pittsburgh particularly intriguing: brought in a grocery store that hires local people and the land is owned by a nonprofit which works in the community!


Friday, May 17, 2013

Scaling Up The Cooperative Economy | Community-Wealth.org

Great piece!  We need more faculty and students to study these models and universities to participate in them.  Hello CUNY!? 

The Cooperative Issues Forum

Tuesday, May 7, 2013

A Sheik’s Vision Could Trump Plan for a Queens Park - NYTimes.com

great piece on the breaks developers' get and the way in which these types of project rob residents of everdya amenities. 

"As it stands, Sheik Mansour bin Zayed al-Nahyan would pay $1 per year on his city lease, and no sales or property taxes. By contrast, the owner of a Flushing Meadows taco van could pay as much as $30,000, and pay sales taxes."



A Sheik’s Vision Could Trump Plan for a Queens Park - NYTimes.com

Sunday, April 28, 2013

For Scott Stringer, winning's the easy part | Crain's New York Business

Reminaging this job, just in terms of what the city's pensions are inevsted in, could be huge for making economy of nyc more democratic, resilient and inclusive; why not fund sustainable infrastructure, worker coop's, land trusts, and community development that stabilizes rents?


Scott Stringer

Thursday, April 18, 2013

Real Estate Weekly » Blog Archive » Pinsky: New York won’t abandon coastline

Lower Manhattan rebuilds again, until the next time | Capital New York

This is one of the very few detailed pieces i've seen that talks about the "manged retreat" option for NYC; i.e. that major building in Zone A, ESPECIALLY in lower manhattan, does not really make sense for anyone. 

lower-manhattan-rebuilds-again-until-next-time

Friday, April 12, 2013

How To Manage a Constellation

Another great piece, with fantastic hyperlinks, from Thackera, this time on how to put together a participatory process that can move diverse groups towards creative inclusive socio-ecological sustainability.  Really intrigued by the "boundary object" idea and what would it look like for NYC bioregion?  what sort of artifact-scheme, diagram, image, desire?

Venice: from Gated Lagoon to Bioregion: Observatory: Design Observer

Absolutely fascinating piece.  Not just on the amazing city that Venice is, and its problems (it's sinking!) but also on why it's having such a difficult time taking the imaginative leap: lack of creative democratic governance process.

"Humans, water, and nature are profoundly interrelated in the Venice lagoon — but they are profoundly dis-connected in its governance.  While the Italian state deploys hard infrastructure to create a gated lagoon, Corila’s researchers work separately on a new morphological plan. While myriad heritage groups campaign to protect the built city from floods and tourists, artists and scientists dream up radical scenarios of their own. Native Venetian citizens, for their part, work in tourism, and dislike doing so — but hear little about these alternative projects and visions. The cruise ship industry, proclaiming that there is no alternative source of jobs and prosperity, is left to do its own, ecocidal, thing.

What’s missing is a shared vision around which all the stakeholders who are now separated from each other — municipalities, citizens, artists, mussel farmers, research institutes — could collaborate.
Bringing the lagoon as a bioregion back to life could surely be that issue."

Thursday, April 4, 2013

The Bullitt Center in Seattle Goes Well Beyond Green - NYTimes.com


Yeah its expensive and upscale but I love this project for two reasons, oddly, both involving anarchists.  First off the visibility of the engineering.  The guts of the building, what makes it work are exposed to those who use it.  This helps the users appreciate the impact of what they are doing (from using appliances and computers to going the bathroom!) and helps them to change their behavior to be more responsible.  But it also helps to call attention in a more general sense to the numerous ways we interact with buildings and the variety of systems involved.  The great anarchist social ecologist Murray Bookchin calls for such an architecture in a few of his works and essays.  And this is certainly the view of bioregionalists as well who go beyond sustainability advocates by calling for a closer understanding and identification with place—not just conservation and recycling etc. 

The second thing I love about this and it reminds me of the anarchist geographer Peter Kropotkin is that the building’s systems are not only visible to its users and inhabitants but to the public.  The guts are exposed so as to promote accountability and inspire. 





Service to South Ferry subway stop to resume on Thursday for first time since Hurricane Sandy - NYPOST.com

It cost 500 million to build, it will cost 600 million more to repair and it will flood again in how long?

Service to South Ferry subway stop to resume on Thursday for first time since Hurricane Sandy - NYPOST.com

Thursday, March 28, 2013

Amanda Burden, Planning Commissioner, Is Remaking New York City - NYTimes.com

The importance of this office could majorly increase re: Sandy redevelopment:

“I like to say that our ambitions are as broad and far-reaching as those of Robert Moses, but we judge ourselves by Jane Jacobs’s standards,” Ms. Burden said.

REALLY?
Her fans say that Ms. Burden is a visionary who will leave behind a much-improved city. “There is no question that under Amanda’s leadership, New York has experienced a renaissance,” said Vin Cipolla, president of the Municipal Art Society of New York, “with more development of parkland, waterfront and infrastructure over the last 10 years than in the 100 years before it.” But critics say that the sum total of Ms. Burden’s ambitions will be a gentrified city that no longer has a place for working-class New Yorkers. “The overall effect of the city’s rezonings has been incredibly dramatic in terms of the creation of expensive, market-rate housing and typically middling at best in terms of affordable housing,” said Andrew Berman, the executive director of the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation.

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

| Brooklyn Daily Eagle

The city continues to sell more of its valuable properties for hi end real estate development when there is no shortage of luxury apartments and a incredible shortage of affordable housing, community space, and green space.  Not to mention my students yesterday were complaining about the lack of libraries of adequate size in their neighborhoods!

Sunday, March 3, 2013

| Brooklyn Daily Eagle



The closing of LICH Hospital by SUNY Downstate after they bought it from Continuum (after they siold all the high value assets!) is really emblematic of a transformation in Brooklyn which is gonna majorly displace people in terms of both real estate and space as well as essential services.  There needs to be a very different model for partnerships among the city, hospitals and health care providers with respect to the neighborhoods they operate in.  Mondragon Spain would be a great model.  There worker coop's and the local state operate the hospitals and the provide the insurance and healthcare.  Better quality and more efficient/inclusive. 




Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Brooklyn's Income Inequality: Global Causes, Local Effects | BkBureau.org

 Great piece on race and economic inequality and the global economy in brooklyn.  One incredible example: "In census tract 21, which includes DUMBO, the median household income was $149,000, although for whites, who represent 80 percent of the population, the median household income was significantly higher at $163,000. For blacks the median household income in that area was $23,000."




Mayor Michael Bloomberg employs innovative contest style to bring bright, new ideas to meet city challenges - NY Daily News

Wow, in some ways this is the exact opposite of participatory budgeting: there is no discussion of needs, no deliberation about proposoals, no collaborative creativity in the evaluation process, just a bunch of isolated submissions chosen by a sole figure at the top!

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg presents his city budget proposal for fiscal years 2009-2013, in New York's City Hall Friday Jan. 30, 2009. Mayor Michael Bloomberg says Wall Street firms are expected to lose a total of $47.2 billion for 2008, and even more in 2009. The figures are devastating for New York City. (AP Photo/Richard Drew, Pool)

Storm recovery chief says Staten Island must look beyond Hurricane Sandy | SILive.com

"The goal is to look beyond hurricanes, at all types of weather events, and to look beyond just the neighborhoods hit so hard by Sandy, in making their recommendations." Uh oh! 'Storm rebuilding czar' Seth Pinsky visits Staten Island

Purchase of Meat Market by BC Causes Upset Brooklyn News Service

There is a serious shortage of even mediocre affordable food around BC, and grocery stories in particular. The community is angry, and many ideas for other options are being discussed, including a food coop. There are amazing possibilities here! Purchase of Meat Market by BC Causes Upset

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Campus Workers Win Training, Hours to Cook Better Food | Labor Notes

this is a fantastic program and contract! and BC has no food vendor right now--metropolitan's contract has expired and they are still searching for new one. Hmm. Could train the existing staff ...